Fluoridating drinking water could reduce financial burden on the NHS

fluoride

New research has shown fluoridating water could be the key to reducing the financial burden on the NHS

Fluoridating drinking water could reduce the huge financial burden on the NHS caused by children’s oral health.

These fresh claims come after new research, published in Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology journal, showed fluoridating tap water could improve children’s oral health and ‘solve the UK’s child tooth extraction crisis’ without having any negative effects to health.

‘This new research reinforces what we have known for a long time regarding the benefits that fluoride can have on children’s teeth, while also emphasising the fact that fluoridation has no negative impact on general health,’ chief executive of the British Dental Health Foundation, Dr Nigel Carter OBE said.

‘By introducing fluoride into our drinking water we can help to prevent tooth decay, one of the most common chronic diseases in both children and adults in the UK.

‘Currently only around 12% of the UK population live in areas that have fluoridated water and the NHS has to pick up the burden when it comes to the consequences to our teeth, I can speak from personal experience having practised for many years on the borders of fluoridated Birmingham and the then non-fluoridated Sandwell.

‘The difference in child oral health either side of the dividing road was immense.’

Fluoridation

The research found 55% fewer admissions for tooth extractions in areas that have fluoridated schemes in place compared with those that don’t.

Currently six million people live in areas of the UK where fluoride is added to tap water, with an additional one million people living in areas with natural levels of fluoridated water.

‘Countless reports have been published throughout the world about fluoride,’ Ben Atkins, clinical director of Revive Dental Care and trustee of the British Dental Health Foundation, said.

‘After many years, the scientific conclusion is that fluoride toothpaste and correctly fluoridated water are of great benefit to dental health, help to reduce decay and cause no harmful side effects to general health.

‘Practising as I do in the north west of England, an area with some of the highest levels of decay in England, the reduction in suffering that would be caused by water fluoridation is immense.

‘We have to face facts, we are facing a crisis when it comes to our kid’s teeth and decisive action needs to be taken sooner rather than later as a struggling NHS cannot shoulder this burden forever, fluoridation schemes offer an easy and harmless way of improving our children’s dental health.’

2 Comments

  1. 1

    There are so many wrong and misleading comments in this article that it would take a book to refute them all. Wait–there is a book, THE CASE AGAINST FLUORIDE, by 3 PhDs, one of whom is also an MD. It draws on over 800 scientific studies and provides many references to refute common misconceptions and deceptions about fluoridation. This practice is antiquated, unsafe, ineffective and unethical. I encourage you to read the new studies that show harm and possible harm to virtually every system in the body, including the brain, neurological system, the thyroid gland, the kidneys and bone. And the majority of studies show minimal or no helpful effects–the data above is widely skewed. As a recent Nobel Laureate in Medicine stated, water fluoridation is the biggest scam ever propagated against society.

    • 2

      Dr Dickson correctly says that water fluoridation is unsafe. It appears the NHS have not taken into account the cost of medical treatment for those suffering the side-effects of fluoride treatment via drinking water.[As a health practitioner in Geelong, Australia, I find some patients becoming extremely unwell from asthma, irritable bowel syndrome, muscle fatigue after drinking tap water since Geelong’s water was fluoridated in 2009. When medical testing has been done, it has confirmed the link between the illness and fluoride. Until the cost of disease treatment for such common and serious diseases that may come from fluoridated water are taken into account, no valid claim of cost saving to the NHS from fluoridating water can be made.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like