Dental news
Dentistry News | Dental Jobs | Dentist Forum | CPD Education

Dental news

RSS Feed View by: Most Recent | Most Popular | Most Discussed

New study questions 'cavity-fighting' fluoride

17th Dec 2010

Email this story
Email this story
  
Share this story
Digg it submit to reddit printer-friendly version

Scientists have discovered that the protective shield fluoride forms on teeth is up to 100 times thinner than previously believed.

The study now poses a question mark over how this cavity-fighter really works and experts say it could lead to better ways of protecting teeth from decay.

Frank Müller's study – Elemental Depth Profiling of Fluoridated Hydroxyapatite: Saving Your Dentition by the Skin of Your Teeth? – is published in the journal, Langmuir.

Widely accepted that fluoride makes teeth more resistant to decay, some expewrte believe that it changed the main mineral in enamel, hydroxyapatite, into a more-decay resistant material called fluorapatite.

But this new research finds that the fluorapatite layer formed in this way is only six nanometers thick and this questions whether a layer so thin – which is quickly worn away by chewing –can shield teeth from decay, or whether fluoride has some other unrecognised effect on tooth enamel.

The team is now launching a new study in search of an answer.

Advertisement

In an abstract of the study, the team notes: ‘Structural and chemical changes that arise from fluoridation of hydroxyapatite (Ca5(PO4)3OH or “HAp”), as representing the synthetic counterpart of tooth enamel, are investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). ‘Elemental depth profiles with a depth resolution on the nanometer scale were determined to reveal the effect of fluoridation in neutral (pH = 6.2) and acidic agents (pH = 4.2). With respect to the chemical composition and the crystal structure, XPS depth profiling reveals different effects of the two treatments. In both cases, however, the fluoridation affects the surface only on the nanometer scale, which is in contrast to recent literature with respect to XPS analysis on dental fluoridation, where depth profiles of F extending to several micrometers were reported.'

It adds: ‘In addition to the elemental depth profiles, as published in various other studies, we also present quantitative depth profiles of the compounds CaF2, Ca(OH)2, and fluorapatite (FAp) that were recently proposed by a three-layer model concerning the fluoridation of HAp in an acidic agent. The analysis of our experimental data exactly reproduces the structural order of this model, however, on a scale that differs by nearly two orders of magnitude from previous predictions. The results also reveal that the amount of Ca(OH)2 and FAp is small compared to that of CaF2. Therefore, it has to be asked whether such narrow Ca(OH)2 and FAp layers really can act as protective layers for the enamel.'

For more on the study, go to http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/la102325e.

Rate this story


Comments

avatar placeholder
At the clinical level we never measure this thickness, we only observe the results obtained. Over the years the benefits have been spectacular. The theory will be revised and we will benefit from the analysis. Prevention in practice will be enhanced by the 'fine tuning' of our understanding, our teaching and our methods. Let us hope that the wrong end of the stick is not wilfully grasped by those who wish to denigrate the overall role of fluoride in caries prevention.
Posted by Jimimac 20/12/10 at 16:43
avatar placeholder
You are absolutely right. Unfortunately I see a risk that the results can be interpreted by the groups opposing/ lobbying against fluoride as such.
Posted by Frasse 20/12/10 at 22:19
Please log-in to post comments or register here.



Search
Members' Area
Remember me    Register free | Forgotten password

What are we electing?
The DH may well say 'Who do I call if I want to speak to the BDA?'
View all blogs

Advertisement