Dental news
Dentistry News | Dental Jobs | Dentist Forum | CPD Education

CQC compliance guide – Step 2, Acceptance

24th Feb 2011

Email this story
Email this story
  
Share this story
Digg it submit to reddit printer-friendly version

There is a great deal of negativity surrounding the whole issue of CQC compliance. There are three approaches which seem to prevail: the first equates to 'the end of the world is nigh', the second is all-consuming panic and the third is one of 'we've got that covered and we are getting on with running our practice efficiently and moving on to more inspiring things'.

I personally have probably started out with the second and hope soon to be in the third, I'm sure I'm not alone. Clearly, there is still a minority who truly believe the world will end.  CQC is a set of habits – they will take a bit of effort to adopt, but once they are there, they won't require too much more effort.
 
In the summer, a medical GP moved her practice to our building. In order to practice she had to show compliance with CQC (medics have had to comply for a couple of years).

She had previously been in an independent partnership but, under the umbrella of a private hospital, so most of the requirements had been handled by the umbrella organisation.

She knew she had to sort it for herself as well as setting up her new practice and that she would be inspected. She got her head down and diligently put the paperwork in order at the beginning.

When inspected apparently the comment from the inspector was that she was 'the most inspirational GP she had met in a long time'.

The inspector was not commenting on her 'box-ticking abilities', she was commenting on the fact that she had set up something of value which was inspiring. She had done what was necessary, set it aside and got on with all the other things on the agenda.
 
CQC has been added to the 1,001 other things that we have to do in our practices and as practice owners we are in danger of feeling overwhelmed.

Advertisement

However, once the systems and habits are in place, we will all move on with the confidence of knowing the house is in order. We will emerge as more confident owners and leaders than before.

There is not a successful business in the civilised world which is not subject to regulation and that will have chosen to be  systematised. That is how they achieve the necessary consistency to be successful and are able to expand and diversify as they wish. 
 
Thousands of pounds are spent by many dentists each year on business gurus to take their practices forwards, many fall at the first hurdle because they can't be bothered, first of all, to deal with the boring things – the starting place for much of this is uncannily similar to the CQC requirement.

Much of it is sound business practice, most of it is not new but has just not been regulated.  Some of it is excessive but nothing is without its advantages. Systems, that is all this is, and with it a giant accompanying checklist – anyone who has tried to systematise their practice starting from anywhere other than the very beginning has had an equally big headache, albeit a self-inflicted one.
 
CQC will soon have had its day and we will all move on – if we play it right instead of becoming a profession of 'grumpy old men' we will move forwards with proper line management and delegation.

Systems and policies will be in place which take the stress out of so many situations. Invaluable feedback from patients, which we are justified in asking for and can use to improve our practices still further, will be commonplace.
 
Over the years, the dentists I have met – who are in control of their practices instead of being controlled by them – are the ones who have signed up to the 'Investors in People'-type schemes – whether officially or a version of their own design.

They have seen a need and put the necessary disciplines in place. The ones who have stood still or struggled are the ones who have felt self indignant.

The 'grumpy old men' will probably close their doors and find an excuse which says it was someone else's fault… the reality is they have probably been struggling to stand still for years.  I believe you either move forwards or backwards.

I am going forward positively and there will be many others who will do so, too!

Author

Gaynor Barrett


Dr Gaynor Barrett graduated from Guy’s Dental School in 1989, having won both the Newland Pedley Medal and Prize and the Stephen D Hey Prize for Restorative Dentistry in her final year. She went on to complete further hospital training first of all as House Officer in the Department of Restorative Dentistry at Guy’s Hospital and then at Stoke Mandeville Hospital where she held the position of Senior House Officer in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Since 1991, she has been in private practice in London’s West End medical district and Principal Dentist since 2000. Gaynor Barrett is the mother of four children and has successfully combined a high profile career with caring for her own children.

Rate this story


Comments

avatar placeholder
More Drivel from the lady with a posh practice address. Your situation is not representative of the majority of the Dentists in this country. Your reality is miles away from them, hence the insulting words about the "old grumpy men" .
I am 35 years old and in the final stages of emigrating to Canada but I am wondering what these "old grumpy men" have to say about this?


Posted by Frasse 24/2/11 at 19:08
Good luck to you Frasse from this 'grumpy old man' - well, approximately 4 years older than the article writer, anyway. I got a prize in my final year, as well, but I've never got around to writing either such self-serving twaddle, or to brag about successfully combining a 'high profile' career with my family life, in the manner of those dreadful round-robin Christmas card inserts. You know: 'Jemina just got a first at Cambridge, and Toby won the Nobel peace prize. We bought a Bentley Continental and refurbished the house in Monte Carlo.'

--This post was last edited on 24/2/11 at 22:36--
Posted by docholliday 24/2/11 at 22:13
avatar placeholder
Thanks docholliday. Always enjoy your comments. I have seen some of the so called "high profile" Dentist's (not referring to this lady) handy work from London's west end when I was a postgraduate. Some of them could keep the GDC's fitness to practice panel busy for weeks !
Posted by Frasse 24/2/11 at 22:28
avatar placeholder
Knowing the Posh Lady and as a self admitted GOM, I'd better tell Frasse and Doc H that, in this case they are both Way out of Line. Neither of you will ever know a more committed or ethical Dentist than GB, despite her address. Yes, the CQC is a lot of twaddle in most respects, but it's there guys. The Brave New World of The Coalition has re-underlined it's credentials and taking GB's positive approach is the ONLY way to deal with it. Oh, I work principally on the great disenfranchised of the last 4 (nearly 5) years, the unnaccepted unprotected NHS patients. Generally, their previous advice and treatment, or lack of, is one of THE great scandals of the current Health Care climate. My objection to CQC is not its requirements, but that we have a state system contract that is a disgrace and that the Pilots to replace it ignore The Elephant in the Room. (UDA's demand neglect) so Dentists have to check for Legionella & have Washer Disinfectors to "prevent" the transmission of diseases that NEVER occur, while ignoring the disease they are actually trained to prevent and treat. It's not compliance with CQC that's the problem. It's the Obsessive Compliance Culture while not performing primary clinical care that is to the utter shame of both Bureaucrats, the grafting sycophants and the Profession & particularly it's leaders.
Posted by extractor1 25/2/11 at 17:17
Interesting. I laughed at Doc H's comments, and sort of agreed with Frasse..(.good luck in Canada..you're doing the right thing for someone in their thirties.) Then I felt a little ashamed when extractor1 weighed in and mentioned that the 'Posh Lady' was a good egg actually. I hope that is true, but it doesn't diminish the annoying aspects of the article. I'd have liked to hear her mention what extractor1 mentioned, which is the silliness of much of what we are being asked to do while missing completely the bigger picture of neglect. Since it's wrong to be asked to check for diseases that never occur, I do have a problem with compliance with the CQC. I hope their mission statement will include the commitment to listen to dentists and change their requirements quite quickly to focus on the real issues in dentistry. I don't think dental practices should have to pay Rentokil ad infinitum to monitor something which has never been a problem. The professional representatives need to dig their heels in, and stop mindlessly agreeing to everything we are asked to do by government quangos, or possibly they've been bought by the washer disinfector manufacturers? A HUGE amount of dental decay is going untreated, especially in children. That is a national disgrace, and CQC compliance will not address it at all in it's current form.
Posted by edwardmk 25/2/11 at 18:34
Way out of line Extractor1! Spheroids, frankly. Are me and Frasse not 'committed', or something?! Obviously the current contract is a disgrace - which is why, in N.E. England, we told the PCT to 'stuff it where the sun don't shine'. Now, in Geordieland IMHO that takes a lot of 'bottle'. More so than in the West End of London. I charge about £40 for an XLA - less than a paying NHS patient pays for band 2 - don't give me any bullsmoke about them getting 3 molar RCT's and 6 immaculate posterior LCC's on the same COT. The new contract is $hi7te. But so is CQC. Sanctimonious c7@p from anyone - posh, not, man or woman doesn't help one iota. I stand by my Christmas Card insert comments. They are simply not the sort of thing 'real people' do 'oop north'. Off to feed the pidgeons!

--This post was last edited on 25/2/11 at 19:02--
Posted by docholliday 25/2/11 at 18:46
avatar placeholder
The Way out of Line comment was in respect ot the assumption that the authors veracity was by some form of inverted snobbery, negated by her Practice address. To the best of my knowledge, the CQC compliance is not area specific but universal. Its similar to the attack on the quality of care, keeping the Fitness to Practice guys busy. Some practices, in all parts of the country and even in the NHS, despite the 2006 contract, have their patients expectations and needs at the top of the list of priorities. To assume an address defines care is just wrong, whether West End or North East, regardless of fees. To bring that into a discussion of the value of CQC is wrong headed. The article is not a blanket approval of CQC. It contains several criticisms. I only wanted to make 2 points. The Author is well intentioned. The CQC is an irritant and an irrelevance while the 2006 contract remains in place and its proposed successors introduce more bizarre methods of assuring reasonable basic care. (Ashamed ? Why ? Ed I wrote it and you agreed with my main point.)
Posted by extractor1 25/2/11 at 19:12
She is well intentioned - but almost certainly out of touch with many others at the 'tooth face'. Yes, we'll comply in N.E England. I just plod on with the Denplan. Roll on retirement.

--This post was last edited on 26/2/11 at 10:15--
Posted by docholliday 25/2/11 at 19:45
avatar placeholder
"A load of spheroids"..? "Out of touch"..? "Posh lady"..? "Self-serving twaddle"..?
Please pass the blog roll! Just listen to yourselves(just try reading it out loud!). Actually none of the above. Dr Gaynor Barrett puts it best when she coins the phrase " struggling to stand still for years" - couldn't have summed it up better myself. What better justification could one(sorry, posh that!) -er, could you have for a body(CQC) to help clear out the stables ready for the monumental jobs ahead: untreated decay in children - YES!, a non-existent awareness of the effects of smoking on dental health - YES!, an uncoordinated strategy by the coalition on the way forwards - YES!...and so on.....these are the things we should be addressing with a ruthless passion! Can't do any of this without this kind of directional inspiration. Keep it coming GB! - the GOM will FBTW(fall by the wayside), and who knows, you might even get the PM on board at number 10 - now there IS an area where a CQC could sort things out, except of course that it's actually run by HMG...
[Can we lose the acronyms now? - Ed.]
Posted by harleydentist 25/2/11 at 20:51
If you really think Dave'n'Nick have any chance of sorting dentistry in the UK, you truly are deluded. Build a core of loyal patients - who all for themselves have sussed-out the great truth: you get what you pay for. Takes years. Sorry for all the youngsters. Truly.

--This post was last edited on 26/2/11 at 09:46--
Posted by docholliday 25/2/11 at 21:39
PS - my mate has a Harley. But I reckon Ancient Brits are best. My BSA 650 Road Rocket still has my heart!
Posted by docholliday 25/2/11 at 21:48
avatar placeholder
Dear extractor1 Thank you for your comment and a very well articulated criticism of my comment. I have never had any intention to attack or belittle Dr GB or any other colleagues in and around London's West End. Many of them are excellent clinicians.(The problem is the "snobbery" that I have witnessed in a few cases. Dr GB's first article about CQC was one of them) Many other colleagues are doing excellent clinical work in much less famous locations in the country and many times with much higher quality. In my everyday clinical life I see the results of a failed Dental Contract carried out both prior to 2006 and after that. So on that I agree with you. What I have not forgotten is my days within the NHS and the Sympathy that I feel for those colleagues who for whatever reason did not walk out. Many of them are doing an excellent job within the confinements of this failed system and all single handed private or independent practitioners trying to do their best for their patients. To simply call them "grumpy old men" and dismiss their objections to CQC is at its best ignorance about the reality of their professional life and at its worst snobbish. I am not out of line when I call that Drivel and I stand by my previous comment. My point is merely that Dr GB professional reality is not comparable with the majority of Dentists in this country. I am against her overenthusiastic support for a bureaucratic and arbitrary system without any scientific evidence for lots of it's (CQC's) guidelines. Surely Dr GB with such a distinguished carrier (by judging her credentials in Dentistry magazine) should adhere to scientific evidence and critical examination of CQC, unless off course this is a marketing ploy to promote her practice even further and generate more income by holding CQC lectures in her seminar room in 38 Cavendish Street. (As she mentions in her first article) The argument that because the coalition politicians and DOH has now decided to implement this, then it is better to bite the bullet and accept it, has no merit. In my opinion that is exactly the problem within the profession.
Posted by Frasse 25/2/11 at 21:21
Well put Frasse. Not that anyone is trying to get some great work of literature onto this blog - well, not me, obviously. I feel the points you set out are relevant and cogent. I feel especially aggrieved as a person I am very close to is a single-handed NHS practitioner, and CQC was I think the 'straw that broke the camels back' (does that read right, Harley?) The dentist concerned is now looking to sell-up, and may even leave dentistry, which I happen to know will be a great loss to our profession. As far as government is concerned, they should IMHO basically 'butt out' of dentistry. A strong core-service NHS for children and 'exempts' - and that is all. Ronald Reagan said 'the most frightening words you can hear are:"I'm from the government, and I'm here to help"'. I think he was right. Government 'help' is not the way to go, and a culture of personal responsibility as well as 'rights' is long overdue in England. I'm not in the least convinced that Dave'n'Nick's PR show is going to deliver.

--This post was last edited on 26/2/11 at 20:55--
Posted by docholliday 26/2/11 at 09:46
To add to what Edward said: I think you have hit it on the head when you say "They've been bought...". When I wrote to the BDA suggesting that part of their duty was to expose corruption and graft, I did not even get a reply telling me that I was imagining it. But, who is prepared to run the risk of reprisal by naming and shaming?
Posted by Martin Rooke-Matthews 27/2/11 at 08:38
I just felt I had to agree with Frasse's comment that the problem now with the profession is our spineless acceptance of so much that has no evidence base. The BDA as a strong voice for general dentists has almost ceased. They were certainly guilty for years of publishing dry dusty academic research papers which took lots of translation to discover the application for dentists at the coal face. Dentists got bored and started to read other magazines. Unfortunately, the pendulum has now swung to dozens of free competitor publications running glitzy advertorial articles that promise dental nirvana if you only buy the latest dental gizmos. Many of those gizmos are very expensive, so the next problem the purchaser has is making them pay their way. You won't see critical articles in magazines that depend on advertising revenue. A large number of dentists are savvy enough to dodge those bullets, so the next step is to make expensive equipment mandatory. I take my hat off to the enterprise of the manufacturer lobby, but I don't need a thirty thousand to one hundred thousand pound makeover shoved down my throat under the guise of a new sterilisation room to satisfy the CQC. Our current arrangements work very well thank you. Has there ever been a documented case of legionnaires disease transmitted by a dental surgery? Are patients contracting MRSA or VRSA in droves in dental surgeries?
The problem is in hospital operating theatres and large institutions. Why do I need to pay a fee for a pre-qualification hazardous waste disposal audit? I'm informed I must declare what I have already declared to be true is actually true, and pay a fee for the privilege. Am I really the minority end of the professional viewpoint bell curve here?
I registered with the CQC last week very reluctantly. I hope they prove me wrong and turn out to be a sensible listening organisation that can modify their approach based on proper evidence. Still no fee decided for the annual re-registration I see. And I'm told we live in a democracy! Grr.
Posted by edwardmk 28/2/11 at 20:46
avatar placeholder
As we have all been delightfully(??) whingeing about the CQC here in the UK - maybe we need a transatlantic change of flavour. I am hoping to go to Gaynor Barrett's Saturday morning seminar this weekend, with two lovely guys from Washington D.C. - just the morning(0900-1330) and plenty of time to get a refreshingly different point of view from our friends over the pond. Check it out: http://www.seminarsthirtyeight.com/events/5-events-seminars She is putting on some great stuff I think!
Posted by harleydentist 7/3/11 at 14:57
avatar placeholder
Have fun! Ask them if they want to work here in the UK !
Posted by Frasse 7/3/11 at 17:47
Please log-in to post comments or register here.



Search
Members' Area
Remember me    Register free | Forgotten password

What are we electing?
The DH may well say 'Who do I call if I want to speak to the BDA?'
View all blogs

Advertisement