Search form

Dental Protection warning over ARF

Dental Protection sends out warnings to dental professionals as many consider withholding their annual retention fee.

The proposed increase in the annual retention fee (ARF) would see the cost for dentists rising from £576 to £945, and the GDC is currently consulting on its proposal. 

Although sharing the concerns of those alarmed by the size of the increase, Dental Protection is warning dental professionals to tread carefully when making public their reaction, and also to think before considering withholding their ARF as both actions would threaten their registration and ability to practise lawfully.

The Dentists Act requires that the ARF is paid in full on or before 31 December (for dentists) and there are no exceptions.

Kevin Lewis, dental director for Dental Protection, said: 'Dental Protection has, for some time, been highlighting the many problems within the GDC’s (General Dental Council's) Fitness to Practise regime.

'This latest announcement serves only to highlight them. 

'Within weeks of the GDC’s own regulator (the PSA) announcing that it is once again investigating the GDC and its Investigating Committee procedures in the wake of further "whistle-blower" allegations, reports of the GDC’s recent activity in the dental press has not helped the profession’s growing loss of confidence in its regulator. 

'The angry debate prompted by the proposed 64% increase in the annual retention fee has created an unfortunate juxtaposition when viewed against a recent GDC campaign in the national press, encouraging private dental patients to make greater use of the Dental Complaints Service.'

Dental Protection advise it would be unwise to follow the 'can’t pay – won’t pay' protest groups because a failure to pay in full will result in automatic de-registration and a delay (plus a loss of income) until one could be restored to the register.

Continuing to practise or to have an interest in the ownership of a practice while unregistered would be the illegal practise of dentistry and/or unlawful involvement in the business of dentistry and could in both respects result in a criminal prosecution and invalidate any professional indemnity held by the dentist in question. 

Dental Protection will be responding to the GDC’s consultation on the proposed increase in ARF for both dentists and DCPs (dental care professionals) and would encourage all registrants to do the same, either as an individual and/or collectively as part of a wider group (LDC/BDA section, etc).

The protection group also advise that public remarks about the GDC’s decision should be measured and directed through normal professional channels, avoiding any personal allegation of bringing the profession into disrepute (notes four and five). 

Dental Protection suggests that the GDC could contain spiralling costs by more effective and proportionate Fitness to Practise (FtP) procedures, which account for around 80% of this year’s budget and are therefore the main reason for the ARF increase being necessary.

Share this story

Related Content

BDA calls on GDC to justify advert

Mick Armstrong, has asked GDC chair, Bill Moyes, to justify why the GDC has paid for an advert in the Daily Telegraph last Saturday (5 July).

GDC responds to The Telegraph advert

The GDC responds to dentists' outcry after it advertised the Dental Complaints Service in The Telegraph this Saturday.

BDA slams GDC proposal to raise the ARF by 64%

The BDA has reacted to the proposed increase of 64% in annual retention fees charged by the GDC.

Thought of the day... annual retention fee

Julian English gives his thoughts on the very high 2015 GDC fees.

Comments

Oh, mustn't 'rock the boat' eh? It's got beyond that stage. As soon as a significant proportion withhold the ARF, that's the end of the GDC. As far as threats to apply sanctions to those who dare express their opinions, that gets my utter contempt. Especially as the centenary of WW1 approaches. People died so we enjoy free speech in Britain. Whether the craven defence organisations like it or not.
randomness